Trudy Kremer

Need to motivate? Illustrate!

 

I value simplicity and directness in communications.  Too often we spend time mired in details that bury our main message.  When I attended the Council of PR Firms 2011 Harvard Leadership Program taught by Dr. Ashish Nanda we studied the miraculous turnaround of SAS airlines.  When businessman Jan Carlzon took over the Scandinavian airline in 1981 it was tanking.  The airline was facing industry challenges including rising oil prices, deregulation and others.  But one of the biggest issues was its very own bureaucratic culture that had hand-tied front-line employees; they could not make timely customer service decisions. To succeed Carlzon had to revolutionize the company and he had to communicate it in a revolutionary way.

He was known for saying, “An individual without information can’t take responsibility. An individual with information can’t help but take responsibility.”

But the challenge was how to deliver information effectively to a wide audience.  One of the most unique approaches he took was in writing a book entitled, Let’s Get in There and Fight! and he sent it to every single employee.  Right down to every gate checker, maintenance worker, baggage handler, flight attendant, manager and pilot.

The text was simple; the images were cartoons – almost child-like – conceivably drawn by Carlzon himself.

For example, he showed a plane taking a nosedive. The text reads, “We are in bad shape.  But we have not reached crisis point yet.  If we were, we would not know how to get our nose up again.  He showed a plane soaring, “But we can.  If we are ready to fight for our jobs and our future.”

No business analysis, no pie charts, no graphs, just a clear call to action, simply presented.

You have to see the book to believe it: http://www.slideshare.net/thecroaker/jan-carlzons-sas-presentation

He also met face to face with employees, listening, surveying, and empowering them to make decisions, eliminating middle management along the way.  Employees, especially the front-line, rallied around his leadership and communications style.  We watched video of Carlzon speaking.  He was engaging, simple and inclusive in his delivery, always using “we” and “us” rather than “you” and “them.”

The changes at SAS led to Air Transport World naming SAS Airline of the Year for 1983 just two years after Carlzon applied his leadership.  Dr. Nanda told us Jan Carlzon’s turnaround of SAS is one of the classic business case studies at Harvard.

Live in a constant state of leadership

 

I went to Duke. I know. You hate Duke, right? Sigh…most people do. And I was there for two national basketball championships. Now you hate me too, right?

The truth is that I was an art history major. I was not exactly camping out in Krzyzewskiville. But last week I learned something about Duke’s Coach K during the Council of PR Firms leadership conference facilitated by Dr. Ashish Nanda, from Harvard. One of his sessions focused on contrasting the leadership styles of Coach K and Coach Bobby Knight. Coach Knight being the well-known mentor of Coach K. Coach Knight also being an infamous figure in college basketball. Coach K being the darling. Two seemingly completely different leaders.

First, Dr. Nanda showed video of Coach K when he turned down the opportunity to coach the LA Lakers to the tune of $40 million. He was humble. He barely spoke anything of himself. An amazing feat considering it was a press conference about him. Rather, he thanked everyone else in the room. He thanked Duke for the opportunity to consider the prestigious offer, the Lakers for offering, his beloved students — he even apologized to Duke’s brand spanking new president for stealing the limelight unintentionally that week. He announced his decision to stay because, “Duke has always taken up my whole heart.” A leader who clearly leads with his heart and stays true to his values. We also watched video of Coach K describing the incredible win during the Duke versus Kentucky game in 1992. They were down a point with 2.1 seconds left in the game. Coach K did not say, “we are down a point,” rather, he emphatically stated, “we are going to win.” And they won.

In stark contrast to Coach K was Coach Knight. Brash, arrogant, pointed and profane. We watched two videos of him when he was accused of abusing his players and watched him defiantly defend himself. I absolutely would have feared being in the hallway with him in college. Then we watched video of him when he won his 880th game at Texas Tech. Still brash, arrogant and pointed, even stating how he knew some hated him and he did not care. But, as you watched him, you saw his passion for his team, his love and respect for them and admiration for what they had accomplished. You could see his commitment to excellence and to his values. One of his students tearily said his relationship with Coach Knight had changed his life like no one before. A dimension of leadership not dissimilar to Coach K. Not worlds apart as they had first appeared, but actually of the same world.

Dr. Nanda coached us through the session and explained along the way.

Effective coaching begins with what you value in life. Both coaches value and love their students, their institutions, their sport and excellence in everything they do.

It continues with conduct that is consistent and committed. Both are incredibly consistent in what they offer and what they expect of others. They live what they say and are completely authentic.

And their leadership is game on. They don’t just coach when there are 2.1 seconds left. They live in a constant state of leadership. Leadership is their heart, soul and passion.

If your message is important, be direct

A friend and client of mine recently linked me to a Nightline story about shock-and-awe PSAs.  The story is about how PSAs are getting grittier to get your attention.  I have to admit — the one about teen texting and driving stuck with me.  It graphically depicts teenagers in a car accident.  Blood and glass flying everywhere.  I cannot shake it.  Watch it.  You won’t be able to shake it either.

The Georgia Meth Project is taking a similar approach. Have you seen the billboards around town or the ads on TV?  They have a big goal — to stop thousands of people in Georgia from ever trying meth.  Can they accomplish it without a big dose of reality?

As we raise the bar on what and how we communicate, I often wonder if more subtle forms of communication are getting lost in the clutter.  Can we still roar with a whisper?  Can we motivate change without telling it like it really it is?

The other day I was driving (OK, so now you know where I get most of my ideas), and I drove under a digital sign that said “Smog alert — Use alternate transit!”  I drove by this sign all summer and thought nothing of it.  But later I thought what if it said, “You are polluting — get on a bus!”  Or better yet, “If you want your child to be able to breathe — carpool!”  That’s right.  Go ahead point your digital finger at me.  Maybe I will make a change.

I had an opportunity to visit a homeless relief center called City of Refuge in Atlanta and meet the director, Bruce Deel.  He uprooted his family to move them to the zip code synonymous for crime in Atlanta.  The highest number of murders, rapes, drug deals happen in 30314 every day.  He has been robbed more than 40 times.  He did not sugar-coat the story.  He did not just tell the nice parts.  He told it like it is.  And he has motivated change where there was no change in Atlanta.  They provide shelter, job training, rehab programs and are building an enormous medical center on a site where there was desolation before.  I suspect a lot of this progress was through Bruce’s ability to persuade, be genuine and tell it like it is.

How do we motivate change through words? When we don’t motivate change, is it because we are beating around the bush?  How direct is too direct?

In a world where there is value placed on 140 characters to communicate, is the best route to go straight for the jugular?  In the blink of an eye, I am already over my character limit.

The simplicity of one

Three months ago I was driving in Atlanta near 14th street. I looked up at a bilboard. It was stark white and had only black letters that said, “Google Puppy Mills.” No images, no paragraphs, just three words. Right in the middle of Midtown’s suits, starbucks and skyscrapers — a simple message that beckons a call to action.

That was three months ago and I have been thinking about it ever since. And I don’t have a dog. Heck, I don’t even have a pet. It was something about the simplicty of message that cuts through the clutter and made me stop to think. I don’t have to Google the words “puppy mills” to create a horrifying image in my mind.

In our daily communications as business leaders, we tend to clutter our messages, cram too much information in, to paint with a big fat heavy paintbrush and not a fine-pointed Sharpie. And our message gets lost.

Traditionally we have been told to stick to three points. Why not a single point? A single image? A single word? If your main message does not fit on a Post-It note, you are probably saying too much.

I Googled “Puppy Mills.”  Believe me. You don’t want to. But you don’t have to. You got the message in just three words.